TOP

세미나

[연구]Adjusting Choice Models to Better Predict Market Behavior

2005.12.01 Views 991 경영학연구분석센터

Marketing Letters
Volume 16, Issue 3, December 2005, pp 197–208
 

Greg Allenby, Geraldine Fennell, Joel Huber, Thomas Eagle, Tim Gilbride, Dan Horsky, Jaehwan Kim, Peter Lenk,
Rich Johnson, Elie Ofek, Bryan Orme, Thomas Otter, Joan Walker
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-005-5885-1
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11002-005-5885-1?LI=true



Abstract

The emergence of Bayesian methodology has facilitated respondent-level conjoint models, and deriving utilities from choice experiments has become very popular among those modeling product line decisions or new product introductions. This review begins with a paradox of why experimental choices should mirror market behavior despite clear differences in content, structure and motivation. It then addresses ways to design the choice tasks so that they are more likely to reflect market choices. Finally, it examines ways to model the results of the choice experiments to better mirror both underlying decision processes and potential market choices.

Keywords

Bayesian analysis extended model of behavior motivating conditions

file

2006.02.06